When to use this prompt
Sales calls and demos
Internal training for new reps
Preparing competitive messaging
Equipping teams to handle objections
The prompt
Write a battlecard comparing our solution [OUR_SOLUTION] with a competitor [COMPETITOR_NAME] for use by sales in the semiconductor industry. Focus on our strengths and how to address the competitor’s perceived advantages. Present the content in confident, concise bullet points.
Variables to replace:
Real-life example of how to use this prompt
To start, let's assume I’m a competitive intelligence manager at Applied Materials. The prompt in the context of Applied Materials would look like:
As you can see, I added specific solution and competitor names to make the battlecard scenario practical and realistic.
Example output from ChatGPT for this prompt
And here's the output:
NanoSecure Monitor vs. FabGuard — Battlecard
✅ NanoSecure Monitor: Key Strengths
Unified, real-time visibility across environments (cloud, on-prem, and hybrid) with zero data silos.
Faster deployment & time-to-value with lightweight agents and automated configuration.
Adaptive anomaly detection powered by continuous learning—reduces false positives by prioritizing true risk signals.
Clear, actionable insights, not just alerts—built-in root-cause mapping and guided remediation steps.
Low overhead architecture that minimizes system impact while maintaining high-frequency monitoring.
Enterprise-grade compliance support (audit-ready reports, automated policy tracking, tamper-resistant logging).
Predictable, scalable pricing without hidden modules or expensive add-ons.
⚔️ Positioning Against FabGuard
FabGuard Claims: “Broader Feature Set”
How to Counter:
FabGuard bundles numerous add-ons, but most aren’t deeply integrated—NanoSecure provides one cohesive platform.
Emphasize that breadth is meaningless without context, and NanoSecure’s insights are more accurate, prioritized, and actionable.
FabGuard’s “broad coverage” often means heavier deployments and higher resource consumption.
FabGuard Claims: “More Configurable / Customization Options”
How to Counter:
Over-customization leads to complex setups, brittle rules, and long onboarding times.
NanoSecure offers smart defaults, adaptive tuning, and guided workflows—80% of the value on day one, not after months of tuning.
Highlight that automation reduces reliance on scarce specialized analysts.
FabGuard Claims: “Stronger Industrial/Operational Monitoring”
How to Counter:
Many of FabGuard’s industry-specific modules require separate licensing and isolated dashboards.
NanoSecure provides consistent cross-environment monitoring—ideal for organizations transitioning to more integrated IT/OT security.
Our flexible connectors give the same depth without siloed tooling.
FabGuard Claims: “Market Legacy / Longer Track Record”
How to Counter:
Legacy often means slower innovation, outdated architectures, and expensive maintenance.
NanoSecure is modern, cloud-optimized, continuously updated, and built to scale with current environments—not systems designed a decade ago.
🏆 When to Position NanoSecure Monitor
When the prospect needs rapid deployment, fast insights, and lower operating overhead.
When they value integrated, easy-to-use monitoring rather than stitched-together toolsets.
When accuracy, actionable intel, and scalable pricing matter more than long, complex feature lists.
Or to be more specific:
Pro tips
Keep bullets short and memorable
Address competitor strengths objectively
Highlight differentiation backed by evidence
Maintain a confident, non-confrontational tone
